Sunday 27 May 2012

Child Benefit - The new Income Tax Charge

I recently went on a brilliant tax update course with my favourite tax speaker Tim Palmer taking it. He shared some very interesting stories about the latest tax investigations but he also brought us up to date with the latest tax position on child benefit, which I thought I would share with all of you as it is very interesting and probably some of you reading this will be affected.

Firstly legislation has been introduced to impose a new tax liability on a taxpayer who has income greater than £50,000, where they receive child benefit. It is important to note this is not the collective income with your partner and if your income is less than £50,000 and so is your partners, then the child benefit is not taxable. This new legislation comes into effect from 7th January 2013.

The £50,000 is 'net taxable income' i.e. after gross pension contributions but before personal allowances. For the current year (2012/13) taxpayers will pay income tax on the period 7 Jan 2013 - 5th April 2013.

Therefore if your income is between £50,000 - £60,000 you will have to pay income tax of 1% on the amount of child benefit you receive in the year, for every £100 of your income that exceeds 50k. If your income exceeds 60k however you will pay an income tax bill that actually equals the child benefit! For example if you have income of £60,000 and your partner received child benefit for 2 children of £1,752 for the year, the income tax will equal £1,752 which is the full amount received anyway giving a nil effect.

Individuals who earn above £50,000 per annum and receive child benefit will now need to register for self assessment with HMRC or face penalties in the future!

This will force thousands of individuals into a self assessment regime. Furthermore HMRC guidance states that you have to declare the amount you are entitled to and not received as the figure to go onto the retune.

If you do earn above 60k you can if you wish elect to not claim child benefit by disclaiming it permanently. HMRC will be producing a form in the coming months to enable this to happen. However my opinion is that the majority of individuals will still keep it as their partners have used the income for their children and more importantly for the 'stay at home mums' will lose the Home Responsibility Protection which will mean they may lose the qualifying years for their state pension, meaning their state pension will be lower.

I do not agree with the government on this and feel it is unfair and also to bring this into the self assessment tax regime is unnecessary and I can predict a lot of complications in the future.

As stated above this will no doubt affect a lot of you reading this as you will now need to complete tax returns and register with HMRC - Please contact me for a free initial chat and I will happily advise you

Thank you for reading my blog and please like or share with your contacts

Mitch the Tax Man

mitch@ljd.uk.com

Tuesday 15 May 2012

Tax Evasion or Tax Avoidance?


Ever since the last Budget there has been a lot of commentary on tax avoidance and following on from last night’s BBC Panorama show 'the truth about tax' I thought I would share my comments and understanding on the difference between Tax Evasion and Tax Avoidance.

Tax evasion is in quite simply unlawful and can expose the taxpayer to penalties. Examples include giving inaccurate information or describing a transaction as something different from what it really is. It is basically a form of deception.

Tax Avoidance however has developed over a number of years in to what we have today in artificial schemes by which a sequence of transactions is undertaken for the sole purpose of mitigating a tax burden much like what was shown in the panorama show.

I have taken a quote from the judge in the tax case Duke of Westminster 35 that perhaps sums it up the best "A taxpayer may have a choice between two or more alternative methods of achieving a desired result. He is entitled to select the method, if lawful which avoids altogether or reduces the tax he would pay on another alternative. He is not to be taxed on the basis that a more normal method would attract a heavier tax burden. The selection of a tax effective method is called tax avoidance"

The best analysis on tax avoidance does come from case law and taken from the 'Ramsay' case the courts came up with a strategy to look at tax avoidance.

1. There must be a per ordained series of transactions

2. Into which are inserted steps which have no commercial purpose except the avoidance of tax

3. In which case the court may disregard the inserted steps in deciding how the transaction should be taxed.

4. Look at the end result.

This is the basic form the courts have been using over the past 20 years to tackle these artifical tax avoidance schemes however many sophisticated schemes have been winning. I believe now along with the Chancellor's Budget we will see more anti avoidance measures put in place potentially starting with stamp duty mitigation and in a fairer society this can only be seen as a good thing. Although how strict these provisions are remains to be seen and I suspect the highly intelligent people operating these schemes will find a way around it.

It is very hard as a tax practitioner to tell a client who wants to minimise his tax liability and has taken part in these various schemes that it is unethical and to me goes against certain principles. I believe others have to suffer and pay more tax whilst people are working within the tax avoidance legislation to sometimes not paying tax at all. However whilst it is still 'law' and the legislation has not been amended then as a practitioner you have to accept the schemes. HMRC of course operate the general anti avoidance provision. Where the scheme must by notified to HMRC by its promoter to obtain a reference number to go on the tax return. There is a £5,000 penalty for failure to notify.

Tax Avoidance is a term that should not be used loosely and can’t be interrupted in a number of ways. Whilst I would not promote any artificial schemes I am all in favour of tax planning to minimise the client’s liability and here are some examples:

1. Income bearing assets should be held by the spouse with the lowest marginal rate to tax.

2. The use of pensions can reduce tax in the years of high income working whilst making provisions when the marginal rate is lower

3. On the sale of a business there is some scope for allocating the price between different assets to reduce the tax burden

I have many more what we call 'lawful' tax planning tips.

I hope you have found this useful and provide a clearer picture of tax evasion and tax avoidance and if you would like any help with your tax or have any questions please email me mitch@ljd.uk.com


Mitch the Tax Man



Friday 4 May 2012

Tax Tips - May 2012


It has been a while since I issued some Tax Tips, so here are 5 important tips you should be aware of for the month of May.

1. Submit your 2011 Tax Return. If you have not submitted last year’s tax return HMRC will now start charging daily penalties. Where a client has not filed a Tax return 3 months from the return due date Daily penalties will start to accrue for a period up to 90 days at a rate of £10.00 per day, the rate is fixed and cannot be changed (except by legislation) and in the majority of cases this will be an automatic process

2. HMRC has wrongly sent penalty notices to taxpayers who no longer have to submit a tax return. If you have received a penalty notice and no longer need to complete a tax return then you can write to HMRC appealing this notice.

3. Do you operate through personal service companies? If so you may be subject to IR35 rules and it is important to have a meeting with a tax advisor to see if any potential liability can be mitigated.

4. Do you operate takeaway food outlets and are you operating the present VAT rules correctly? The new proposals state VAT should be charged on all hot food takeaway except freshly baked bread.

5. End of year PAYE Employers' Return is due in by 19th May. You will needs to submit the P35 & P14 forms online by this date or face a penalty between £100 - £3,000. Even if no tax have been deducted. To avoid unnecessary penalties tell your PAYE office by May 19th that no return form is required.

I hope you found these tips useful and if you require any assistance please do not hesitate to get in touch.

Being the start of the tax year I am looking to speak with newly self employed individuals.

Have a great weekend




Mitch the Tax Man

Mitch@ljd.uk.com
@mitchyoung27